Read More
Nearly 200 disgruntled attendees of the inaugural AIA International Hot Air Balloon Fest Hong Kong, frustrated by unfulfilled promises of tethered rides and displays reduced to mere static balloons due to regulatory issues, have banded together under a local mother's leadership to demand refunds through a legal letter to organizers early next week, amid suspicions the event company is an untraceable shell entity.
ADVERTISEMENT
SCROLL TO CONTINUE WITH CONTENT
Hong Kong’s first international hot air balloon festival, launched earlier this week at the Central Harbourfront Event Space, has sparked significant backlash from attendees.
The four-day event promised tethered hot air balloon rides as its main attraction, but regulatory hurdles prevented any passenger rides, leaving the balloons as mere displays.
Many ticket holders, feeling misled, have accused the organizers of deceptive practices, prompting a growing movement among dissatisfied visitors to seek legal recourse.
A group of nearly 200 affected attendees, led by a local mother, Botan, has formed a collective to address their grievances.
They have engaged legal representation and plan to issue a formal demand letter to the organizers early next week.
Concerns have emerged that the organizing entity may be an untraceable shell company, lacking a verifiable office address, which has complicated efforts to hold it accountable.
The group is also reaching out to district and legislative council members to involve relevant government authorities for support and further investigation.
Compounding the frustration, the organizers’ response has been perceived as dismissive.
On the third day of the festival, no balloons were displayed at all, leaving attendees who paid for entry to face an empty field.
The absence of balloons, coupled with overpriced food options at the venue, intensified public discontent.
With a potential typhoon looming, there is uncertainty about whether balloons will be displayed on the final day, likely fueling further dissatisfaction.
The group anticipates more attendees will join their cause as the event concludes.
The festival, intended as a vibrant public attraction, has instead drawn criticism for poor execution and lack of transparency, leaving many feeling cheated.
The growing collective action signals a push for accountability and refunds, with attendees determined to address the organizers’ apparent mismanagement.















