HK govt slams US report as biased and rejects interference

The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government has strongly rejected a report by a United States congressional commission, calling it biased and an act of interference in China's internal affairs.

In a statement issued on Wednesday, a government spokesperson described the "2025 Annual Report" from the US Congressional-Executive Commission on China as containing "biased, slandering and smearing remarks" against Hong Kong. The spokesperson accused the US of "overriding the rule of law with politics" and making unfounded statements in an attempt to undermine Hong Kong's prosperity and stability.

The government reiterated its commitment to safeguarding national sovereignty, security, and development interests, and to fully implementing the principle of "one country, two systems." It stated it would continue to enforce the Hong Kong National Security Law and the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance to protect against activities endangering national security, while maintaining the rule of law and protecting the rights and freedoms of Hong Kong residents.

The statement defended the city's national security legislation, noting that such laws are common in other jurisdictions, including the US, UK, Australia and Canada. It emphasized that the laws aim to protect national sovereignty and ensure the successful implementation of "one country, two systems," while also safeguarding residents' rights and freedoms.

Addressing judicial independence, the spokesperson said all cases, including those involving national security, are handled strictly based on evidence and law, ensuring defendants receive a fair trial. The government condemned what it called attempts to interfere with judicial proceedings in Hong Kong.

Regarding rights and freedoms, the government stated these are constitutionally protected and that the national security laws also stipulate the protection of human rights. It noted that freedoms, including those of speech and the press, are protected by law but are not absolute and may be subject to restrictions necessary for protecting national security or public order.

The statement concluded by highlighting Hong Kong's economic vitality and its role as an international hub, noting the significant US economic interests and presence in the city. It asserted that a stable and prosperous Hong Kong benefits both Hong Kong and the US.