|

Cigar merchants and aficionados are demanding an
exemption from the blanket ban on smoking in all enclosed public places,
arguing that the move is "barbaric'' and would ruin thriving businesses.
They say that the cigar business and enjoyment of cigars are dependent on
providing an environment to gather and taste cigars, and in such enclosed
establishments the non-smoking public is rarely affected.
``Most customers prefer to sit down in the cigar shops and try them before
buying. If smoking is banned in all indoor places our whole operation must then
be discontinued,'' Kennith Wong, general manager of Pacific Cigars Hong Kong,
said.
The company operates six cigar shops and lounges in the territory and is one of
several key players in the industry which, according to Wong, sells about 1
million premium cigars a year. The luxury items cost between HK$100 to HK$200
each.
Over 20 cigar shops and about 40 cigar bars in the territory would face a 70
percent cut in business or even closure, Wong said, and more than 100 jobs
would be affected by the tobacco control laws.
The Smoking (Public Health) (Amendment) Bill 2005, set to come into effect next
year, will make all covered public places in Hong Kong, including bars,
restaurants, and entertainment venues smoke-free.
Affected venues may be given a grace period of 90 days to prepare.
``A democratic society shouldn't be like this,'' a manager of a hotel cigar shop
and lounge, who declined to be named, said. His shop has about 1,000 regular
customers. ``We support the ban in restaurants, but here we don't disturb
others. It's not illegal, so why not give us a choice? Vehicles let out
hazardous fumes, so why not ban private cars? ''
Kenneth Li, 37, said: ``We are well-mannered and considerate people. How often
do you see someone smoking a cigar in a busy restaurant? For us [lounging in
cigar shops] is a culture, it's a social activity.''
Li's companions, most of them men over 35, criticized the amendment bill as
``barbaric'' and ``authoritarian.''
But although cigar shops and bars do not force passive smoking on the
non-smoking public, they do put the health of serving staff at risk. ``We can
downsize the staff and introduce more self-service. It could be done,'' Wong
said.
But Lo Wing-lok, chairman of the People's Health Action and member of the
Council on Smoking and Health, said he sees no reason for exemptions.
``Many of these cigar shops and bars are in hotels and are a part of the central
air ventilation system. Saying no one else is affected is wrong,'' Lo said.
``Any exemptions would weaken the health warning against something that is
obviously a public health hazard.''
Pacific Cigar's Wong protested: ``Hong Kong is running much faster than other
places in the world,'' quoting exemptions for cigar bars in New York where in
New York City laws also allow restaurant owners to create separate ventilated
smoking rooms.
Last year, Ireland and Norway banned smoking in bars and restaurants, while
recently Sweden joined in the ban for smoking in restaurants.
Scotland and England plan to ban smoking in enclosed public places from 2006.
In Hong Kong, catering and entertainment businesses have protested against the
one-off full ban, which will affect 10,000 bars, restaurants and entertainment
premises such as karaoke lounges, nightclubs, bathhouses and mah-jong parlors.
They expect business to drop by more than 30 per cent after the ban is imposed
and fear it will lead to business closures and staff layoffs.
The ban also covers all 2,000 education institutions and tens of thousands of
workplaces. About 15 percent of Hong Kong's adult population smokes. The
government estimates that only 0.3 percent, or about 2,300 of the 867,000 daily
smokers smoke cigars and pipes.
But cigar lovers say the number is much larger than that and could be up to
30,000.
A spokeswoman from Philip Morris, the largest tobacco seller in Hong Kong with
over 55 per cent of the market share, said: ``We fully support the bill's
principles, but we believe the government should give entertainment venues the
flexibility to decide how to accommodate their smoking customers.''
A spokeswoman from the Health, Welfare and Food Bureau did not respond to
questions concerning the potential negative economic impact the ban is feared
to trigger, saying only that the smoking ban has not affected the businesses of
the tourism or hospitality industries in other jurisdictions including New
York, California and New Zealand. ``The 800 no-smoking restaurants in Hong Kong
have also had very positive experiences,'' she said.
sylvia.hui@singtaonewscorp.com
|