|

The government is pushing ahead with a
controversial plan to amend legislation relating to doctors despite strong
opposition.
Under the amendment, doctors will be barred from practising if they do not
complete a number of courses in a specified time.
The government plans to table an amendment to the Medical Registration Ordinance
during the next legislative year, which starts in September, forcing doctors to
obtain a Continuing Medical Education certificate, and obtain a license valid
for only three years.
The Medical Council, which licenses all 10,100 practising doctors in Hong Kong,
decided three years ago to extend the mandatory continuing medical education
(CME) program from covering only specialists to all doctors.
Under the program, all doctors have to obtain 90 credit points, equal to about
90 hours of courses, within three years to be ``CME-certified.'' Currently,
only specialists are required to take the knowledge-enhancement courses.
Doctors who fail to receive 90 points within three years will be warned and
issued with a one-year practising certificate. They will have to obtain 120
points in the fourth year or lose their licenses. The courses are free of
examinations.
The council's education and accreditation committee chairwoman Grace Tang told
legislators at a health services panel meeting Monday that the voluntary CME
program is running well.
``But the council is responsible in insuring that doctors are up to date with
advances in the profession,'' Tang said.
She said linking the program with license renewal is an ``effective and
feasible'' way to protect public health. She also said that many other
countries are moving in this direction.
Countries that already link CME with the renewal of practising licenses include
New Zealand, Singapore and South Africa as well as some states in the United
States.
Doctors in Singapore must stop practising immediately they fail to meet the CME
requirement.
Deputy Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food Susie Ho said Hong Kong's medical
services were already at a high level, but that it was important to keep
upgrading.
``Possible sanctions being considered include a fine, conditions on practise,
the requirement of an examination and non-renewal of practising licenses,'' Ho
said. ``We do not agree with fines as this would seem as though one was buying
a license.''
She said stringent measures are needed to deal with a small minority of doctors
who may not measure up.
Of all registered doctors, about 7,000 are specialists or specialist trainees
and 3,000 are non-specialists. ``Discussions will be held over the next few
months and the amendment bill on the Medical Registration Ordinance will likely
be tabled during the next legislative year,'' Ho said.
Legislators are divided on the proposal.
Medical sector legislator Kwok Ka-ki said most doctors wanted to improve their
knowledge and it did not matter whether this was voluntary or mandatory.
``But to link this with license renewal does not sound practicable,'' he said.
``In fact, the CME courses provided now are seen as a minimum requirement. A
lot of enhancement programs doctors take on their own are more advanced. Making
doctors sit for 90 hours of training is more a formality than a quality
assurance.''
Kwok said doctors are not children and getting a license to practise medicine is
not easy. Consequently, it should not be easy to lose one.
He refused to guess whether there were other reasons why the council and the
government wanted to push forward the proposal, but he called for more
discussions especially on the variety of enhancement programs.
Liberal Party vice-chairwoman Selina Chow said a practising license should be a
life-long qualification and that further training programs should mean a higher
level of recognition.
Labor sector legislator Li Fung-ying and unionist Chan Yuen-han both agreed that
the level of doctors in Hong Kong was superb and that there was no need for a
mandatory program.
Supporters of the change said that doctors were often involved in life and death
situations and should be constantly monitored.
``As a lawyer, I have seen many cases of medical negligence,'' democrat Albert
Ho said. ``I don't see this as an insult to the profession. I can't see why
there is such strong opposition.''
Independent legislator Albert Cheng said the rights of patients should override
those of doctors.
``Doctors are not the only people that matter as any malpractice can cost
someone his or her life,'' Cheng said. ``The [CME program] doesn't require an
examination yet the doctors still oppose it.''
The number of medical malpractice cases against the Hospital Authority dropped
from 33 in 2000 to nine in 2003. The 2004 figure is not available.
matthew.lee@singtaonewscorp.com
|