|

Designer Karl Lagerfeld plays with the cool kids.
He resides at the center of the fashion industry's concentric circles of
influence. And while he has his own collection called Lagerfeld Gallery, his
singular source of fame is his work for Chanel.
It is a legendary house that is privately held and, in addition to the classic
fragrance Chanel No5 and its signature quilted handbag, it has capitalized on
the iconic Chanel blazer, which is essentially a boxy, collarless jacket
stitched out of boucle.
To purchase a Chanel jacket is to buy into fashion history and all its attendant
mythology.
And so each season, people arrive at the Chanel show to watch the house, led by
Lagerfeld, protect the mystique of the jacket and prevent any dust from
settling on it.
Over the years, Lagerfeld has worked magic with the jacket, tweaking it in
subtle ways so it always looks right for the times and appeals to a new,
younger generation of women.
People come to the Chanel show to watch the glorious jackets go by. And
sometimes, the parade seems endless.
For this coming fall, there are long jackets that come down over the hips and
oversize ones that have the feel of a loose-fitting car coat. And there are
innumerable versions trimmed in fringe, woven with metallic threads and
stitched out of an exaggerated plaid.
While it is fine to occasionally broaden your field of vision to take in the
pretty, gamine-inspired cocktail dresses on the runway or check out the man in
the audience who is dressed like a Vegas-based yogi, it is generally best to
keep your eyes trained on the jackets. Do not look at the banal pleated skirts.
And turn away from the tweed knickers that are almost as silly as the granny
bloomers that made an appearance in Milan at the Giorgio Armani show.
Armani has much in common with the Chanel brand. He also made a name for himself
with an iconic style of jacket - unconstructed, loose-limbed, wool crepe - and
has spent the last few decades tweaking it so it keeps up with the times. The
difference is that Armani created his style. Lagerfeld is keeping someone
else's style alive.
And there are times when it seems Lagerfeld will do anything to keep up a buzz
about the jackets. Once again, he sent men down the Chanel runway wearing
versions of the womenswear. They even had large Chanel satchels draped across
one shoulder.
Some would argue that a Chanel jacket is far more creative and stylish than a
subdued Armani blazer. And that may be true. An Armani jacket is the epitome of
restraint. A Chanel jacket is a statement of wealth and prestige, with its silk
chiffon trims, sequined hemlines and glittering tweeds.
But the different opinions may also have to do with Lagerfeld's ability to throw
himself into the center ring of fashion, to put on a charm offensive and to
absorb popular culture and exploit it to his own ends.
Lagerfeld puts on a flamboyant public image marked by vaguely swashbuckling
attire. He took his bows Friday wearing black trousers and jacket, a black
scarf looped around his chest, white hair in a ponytail, thick-soled alligator
boots that came to the knee and fingers full of jaw-breaking silver rings. He
is a mishmash of gender-bending masculinity. Johnny Depp in Pirates of the
Caribbean. Prince. Tom Cruise as Lestat. Lagerfeld's public persona is
compelling, but a little creepy, too.
Lagerfeld powers Chanel with his design talent - it is no easy feat to reinvent
a simple blazer one season after another - but also with his keen ability to
pinpoint what is hip at the nanosecond it reaches its pinnacle. Lagerfeld
effortlessly manipulates, packages and polishes.
With his own label, he is out to show he can create a personal vision from raw
materials. His Lagerfeld Gallery collection is not new, but it has been more of
a pet project than a business enterprise that has commanded industry attention.
It has been a murkily defined collection of long lines, sharp angles and a dour
point of view.
Lagerfeld once partnered with Diesel to create jeans, but that seemed more a
dalliance related to his newly svelte physique than a serious desire to go into
the denim business.
But with a small collection he designed for low-priced merchant H&M selling
well, he made bold plans. He sold his label to Tommy Hilfiger Corp last year
with the long-range goal of transforming it into a global business.
But what does Lagerfeld stand for?
In the Lagerfeld Gallery collection he presented last week, was there any
reassuring sign of a definitive aesthetic? One that is not Chanel and one that
is not based on vanity? The coats, with their high dramatic collars, were
sophisticated and urbane. But there was also a chocolate brown shearling with a
wide collar that folded over to softly cradle the shoulders.
His color palette, which ranged from black to sweet strawberry pink, was a
surprising departure from his typically dark, brooding aesthetic.
Lagerfeld likes to look forward. Rarely does he rely on vintage clothing bins
and yellowed photographs for his inspiration. He imagines new ways, quirky ways
in which technology infiltrates people's lives.
Low-slung belts with a continuous digital readout scrolling across their small
screens were worn with mannish trousers, and feminine dresses in raspberry pink
with sunburst pleats.
The collection alternated between hard and soft, between straight and curved.
Lagerfeld wasn't exploring gender or dabbling in androgyny. But he was making
note of the various facets of a woman - her ability to muscle her way down a
crowded street with her coat pulled around her like armor, as well as her
desire to walk into a room with such beauty and elegance that the crowd parts.
The difference between the Lagerfeld Gallery and Chanel is that the former
cannot rely on a single garment to sell itself. It hasn't earned that luxury
nor does it bear that burden.
Lagerfeld Gallery is in the midst of formation and it is full of possibilities.
Chanel, no matter what else is on the runway, is always about the jacket. THE
WASHINGTON POST
|