Friday, November 27, 2015   

Fighting to stay

Cannix Yau

Saturday, March 01, 2003

Up to 15,000 foreign domestic helpers could become permanent Hong

Kong residents if a recent ruling by the Court of Final Appeal is

extended by the Immigration Department to cover them.

The court last month ruled that an Indian cook was entitled to right

of abode after being in the SAR for more than seven years.

Six foreign maids have now submitted applications for right of abode,

claiming that a provision in the immigration ordinance, which

stipulates that they are not "ordinarily resident" in Hong Kong, is

unconstitutional. They have lived here from seven to 14 years.


Hong Kong Human Rights Monitor secretary Aaron Nattress said it was

more than likely that the Immigration Department would reject the


If this did happen, the maids would seek legal aid in a bid to get the

Court of Final Appeal to declare the regulation omitting domestic

helpers from seeking permanent residency was unconstitutional.

Nattress said several barristers had already offered their assistance

should the case get to court. "They told me, `You get the case, then

we will help out'," he said.

Nattress said the court ruling in the case of Indian Prem Singh could

pave the way for thousands more foreign maids with seven years'

residence in Hong Kong to seek right of abode.

In its ruling on February 11, the court said a discretionary provision

in the immigration ordinance, that required applicants to be granted

unconditional stay before they could apply for permanent residency,

was unconstitutional.

The court ruled that the provision conflicted with Article 24 of the

Basic Law which stipulates that people who have entered Hong Kong with

valid travel documents, resided continuously for seven years and

intended to take Hong Kong as their permanent place of residence are

entitled to right of abode.

Nattress said before the maids could get right of abode, they would

have to get the court to throw out another provision in the ordinance

which dates back to July 1997 and states that foreign maids are not

"ordinarily resident in Hong Kong". "A senior immigration official

has privately told me that `you may well be right'. Another one also

told me `they may win'," Nattress said.

"After all, the government cannot enact a local law that contradicts

its constitutional laws."

He said the applicants wanted to fight for right of abode as they

wanted to develop their professional careers rather than continue

being maids.

"They would like to use their professional qualifications to develop

better careers. They would like to be able to have their families join

them here like everyone else," he said.

"They do not want to be on welfare. They want to be self-supportive.

They are willing to work, to pay tax and to contribute to society. If

the Basic Law says they have a right to stay after seven years, then

they want that opportunity. They do not want to be discriminated


Nattress said the maids also wanted to challenge the rule that forced

them to leave Hong Kong within two weeks of losing their jobs.

"It's really ridiculous. Some of them have been here for 14 years and

yet they have to get out within 14 days," he said.

Nattress said he had informed the office of the Philippine Senate

president Franklin Drilon and Philippine Consul-General Victoria

Bataclan who were very positive about the move.

However, barrister-legislator Audrey Eu, who won the case for Prem

Singh, was not upbeat about the maids' chances. She said their case

involved a different legal point from that of her client, and she was

not certain they came under the provisions of the Basic Law. "It's a

very complex legal [issue]," she said.

Eu said the maids' case revolved around whether their stay in Hong

Kong counted as "ordinarily resident". This point did not arise in

Singh's case.

All rights reserved.


© 2015 The Standard, The Standard Newspapers Publishing Ltd.
Contact Us | About Us | Newsfeeds | Subscriptions | Print Ad. | Online Ad. | Street Pts


Home | Top News | Local | Business | China | ViewPoint | CityTalk | World | Sports | People | Central Station | Spree | Features

The Standard

Trademark and Copyright Notice: Copyright 2015, The Standard Newspaper Publishing Ltd., and its related entities. All rights reserved.  Use in whole or part of this site's content is prohibited.   Use of this Web site assumes acceptance of the
Terms of Use, Privacy Policy Statement and Copyright Policy.  Please also read our Ethics Statement.