|(Flight MH370) Beijing salvoes targeting Malaysia expose hypocrisy
China's strident calls for Malaysia to divulge all it knows about the Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 are in stark contrast to its own history of being secretive when calamities have struck, such as after the 2008 Sichuan earthquake, analysts say, AFP's Felicia Sonmez writes.
Premier Li Keqiang on Monday asked Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak to provide details about the missing flight “in a timely, accurate and comprehensive manner,’’ Xinhua said.
This followed more than a week's worth of scathing editorials in state-run media demanding greater openness from Kuala Lumpur and Malaysia Airlines.
“Unless transparency is ensured, the huge international search operation can never be as fruitful as we hope and expect,'' Xinhua wrote in one of several commentaries.
“When faced with catastrophe, honesty is human beings' best solution to finding a chance to prevent tragedies happening again,'' Xinhua continued.
But when foreign ministry spokesman Hong Lei confirmed Tuesday that Beijing had begun searching for the missing plane in Chinese territory – after stonewalling 24 hours earlier – he declined to give details.
When did China begin searching its own territory?
Which government agencies were involved?
Were any searches being conducted in the restive western regions of Tibet and Xinjiang, where satellite data suggests the aircraft could have flown?
Hong responded only that “in accordance with the request of the Malaysian side, we have mobilized satellites and radar for search in the northern corridor inside the territory of China.’’
Chinese media have been instructed to follow Xinhua's lead in reporting the incident, according to insiders – a regular occurrence.
The International Federation of Journalists said in a statement: “It is deeply regrettable that Chinese authorities continue to use methods such as these to control the flow of much-needed information, particularly for those desperately awaiting updates on the investigation.''
Even when Beijing last week released satellite photographs of three floating objects it said could have been related to the missing flight, the move was met with skepticism, as authorities offered no explanation for the images being made public three days after being taken.
Beijing's reticence is not surprising, analysts say, noting that for the countries taking part in the search, geopolitical sensitivities are as much at play as humanitarian considerations.
The initial operations in the South China Sea were “a peacetime test of many of the military functions that would be critical in the event of a conflict,’’ James Brown, a military fellow at the Lowy Institute for International Policy in Sydney, told AFP.
The militaries in question will have been “closely watching each other's performance, and wary of exposing any vulnerabilities – to each other, and to their own domestic political audiences,’’ he added.
But Beijing also has a long record of covering up any incidents that could be seen as embarrassments for the ruling Communist Party, tightly restricting information and blocking any attempts at independent verification.
Chinese campaigners questioning whether corruption was to blame for thousands of children being killed as their schools collapsed in the 2008 Sichuan earthquake were met not with answers, but with beatings and arrests.
Three years later, after 39 people were killed and nearly 200 injured in a deadly high-speed train crash near the eastern city of Wenzhou, authorities triggered a national outcry when they ordered the wreckage be buried to “protect the country's technological secrets.’’
More recently, state-controlled media were ordered not to publish independent reports on a fiery October crash in Tiananmen Square or this month's mass stabbing attack at Kunming train station.
Plane crashes on Chinese soil have typically been treated by authorities as highly sensitive, with reporters given limited access to the crash sites and, in years past, blocked entirely from reporting on them.
Beijing uses its “state secrets'' law to silence dissidents and block the release of unfavourable reports on China's environmental and other conditions, campaign groups say.
It uses a “vague, circular, and overbroad definition of what constitutes a state secret,’’ and is part of “the policy of information control at the heart of the state secrets system,’ US-based Human Rights in China said earlier this month.